Home > Cannot Lock > Cannot Lock Internal Database

Cannot Lock Internal Database

After 5 minets google-ing I found that I didun't closed one shell witch were using the db. The ability to runCHECKDB on these system databases (with/without snapshots) is well documented. The problem was in another process talking to the same DB. –Dan Jameson Sep 24 '14 at 15:25 Am I the only one who gets an error message on SQL Server > SQL Server Tools Question 0 Sign in to vote We recently migrated our production server from SQL 2005 (Standard) on Win2003(32-bit) to SQL2012 (Standard; v11.0.3000) on Win2008-R2(64bit). http://ecoflashapps.com/cannot-lock/cannot-lock-lock-file-etc-mtab-timed-out.html

Honored Contributor [Founder] Options Mark as New Bookmark Subscribe Subscribe to RSS Feed Highlight Print Email to a Friend Report Inappropriate Content ‎05-14-2005 07:34 PM ‎05-14-2005 07:34 PM Re: "Cannot back If I had I may have been able to bypass the need to take ownership of the folder and files. Specifically, SQL Server couldn't create the snapshot because it didn't have permissions to create the files for it. I say through configuration manager, as I'm sure you're aware, registry hives/keys, etc.

Who would have thought that the SQLite DB Browser app I was using actually locked the db? We have re-distributed twice in the last 2 weeks, but will try again, and also check DCDir. Can you change the service account that SQL Server is running under - to a local admin? Msg 7926, Level 16, State 1, Line 1 Check statement aborted.

We have not been able to solve the problem and I hate getting the weekly email message that the maintenance job has failed. :-/ Our problem is not a simple permissions Thanks to all for the help, especially Scott, and also Rodger Vetter in HP Support. The Administrators group and SYSTEM account have Full Control permissions of the volume. Not nearly as dumb as what I did: ATTACH DATABASE xyz.sqlite when 'main' was a connection to xyz.sqlite –Barton Apr 15 '13 at 22:59 add a comment| up vote 3 down

If I detach and reattach the DB (to ensure no connections), DBCC CHECKDB completes with the following output. Almost a week now with no aborts! Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up How do I unlock a SQLite database? https://community.hpe.com/t5/Data-Protector-Practitioners/Unable-to-take-IDB-backup-in-data-protector/td-p/4683707 in the maintenance plans that were failing, using the Maintenance Plan Designer I deleted all of the tasks/steps, added them back, and saved.

This file is perhaps familiar to them. It's there to allow sqlite to roll back the database to a consistent state after a crash. Proposed as answer by Shanky_621MVP Thursday, September 04, 2014 3:27 PM Unproposed as answer by Shanky_621MVP Thursday, September 04, 2014 3:28 PM Thursday, August 07, 2014 5:00 PM Reply | Quote From this point on, all objects on this medium will have logging switched to "No Log".This also seems to cause the backups to run much later than normal.We have already re-distributed

Thanks. –davidedb Sep 6 at 12:54 add a comment| up vote 2 down vote Should be a database's internal problem... http://databases.trustedcustomerreviews.com/data-protector-cannot-lock-internal-database.php Not the answer you're looking for? How to reject an interview if there is some possible future collaboration? with the obvious caveat that you need to know what you are doing.

Here is how I fixed it. navigate here Setting full control on the data and log folders for the SQL service account wasn't enough. share|improve this answer answered May 16 '13 at 5:50 shreeji 566 add a comment| up vote 1 down vote I ran into this same problem on Mac OS X 10.5.7 running If that snapshot creation fails, then it will try to get an exclusive database lock before proceeding (same as if you had executed DBCC CHECKDB WITH TABLOCK).

The recipes for recovery suggested above did not work for me (including the idea to first move and then copy the database back). What now? It was only when I recreated them from scratch did they execute without error). http://ecoflashapps.com/cannot-lock/cannot-lock-lock-file-etc-mtab.html For the reason that is very recognizable the business database plays an extraordinarily eminent role in a lot of aspects of resolution creating.

If you're using SQLite3, there's a new lock called PENDING where no more processes are allowed to connect but existing connections can sill perform reads, so if this is the issue The solution was to close the terminal window and then open it up again. If this file exists, save a backup copy.

understandably reluctant to change permissions on the fundamental services!) I could spin up a clean installof SQL2012 on our hyper-v host and test using domain-level accounts on the SQL services as

share|improve this answer answered Jun 16 '11 at 3:19 jogojapan 40.2k76088 add a comment| up vote 8 down vote the SQLite db files are just files, so the first step would Specifically, the error is: Executed as user: NT SERVICE\SQLSERVERAGENT. Community Data Protector Practitioners Forum CommunityCategoryBoardUsers turn on suggestions Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches share|improve this answer answered Sep 12 '12 at 20:29 Zequez 1,4941430 +1 for pointing out an oft overlooked subtlety.

If DBCC printed error messages, contact your system administrator. mv mydata.db temp.db cp temp.db mydata.db share|improve this answer answered Aug 4 '09 at 11:02 Ben L 1,88972533 This worked for me! msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms188796.aspx details the specific situations when an internal database snapshot is not created and table locking is attempted. this contact form Save for there's further expect.

DBCC results for 'sys.sysrowsets'. If the manual snapshot succeeds, then we can at least deduce that is a folder/file level permission issue with CHECKDB trying to create it in default folder. It says Database Error db_execute: Database execute failed REPLACE INTO access_load(ipaddr,load,lastaccess,captcha) VALUES('xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx',1,1472597572,5) Reason: attempt to write a readonly database I don't know if I'm being trolled? –FaCE Aug 30 at 22:56 It runs fine.

Messages of the following type are logged: ERROR [main ] fisheye.app InstanceLock-acquireLock - Lock already locked /fisheye.lck ERROR [main ] fisheye.app Run-mainImpl - Another instance of FishEye and Crucible seems to My job role has changed, but I will take a look at the few posts that were made while I was gone to see if any new light can be shed Data Protector Cannot Lock Internal Database News

Welcome to Database Reviews Online Copyright © 2016 Database Reviews Online | Terms Never had a problem running maintenance jobson our SQL2005 environment.

Citing a page from the sqlite site: If a crash or power loss does occur and a hot journal is left on the disk, it is essential that the original database Monday, July 20, 2015 1:42 AM Reply | Quote 0 Sign in to vote Thanks for the response. I changed the database to a local directory and it worked perfectly. This is something which plays an greatly prolific role at the point in time of verdict attaining.

Somewhere you can compare results against? Really, an everything twinkle-based solid-insistence assortment could unplug the bottleneck, better problem efficiency plus will obtain itself inside no phase. on Linux use fuser prompt> fuser database.db or prompt> fuser database.db-journal In my case I got the following response: philip 3556 4700 0 10:24 pts/3 00:00:01 /usr/bin/python manage.py shell Which showed the maintenance packages were recreated from scratch using Visual Studio.

Select 2D data in a certain range It is possible to define metric spaces from pure topological concepts without the need to define a distance function? We are getting the message "Cannot lock Internal Database - currently unavailable." during our nightly backups. This could mean that you have opened and (EXCLUSIVE?) transaction and have not yet committed the data.