Home > Cannot Open > Mdadm Cannot Open /dev/sda Device Or Resource Busy

Mdadm Cannot Open /dev/sda Device Or Resource Busy

Contents

What are the applications of taking the output of an amp with a microphone? I started suspecting I was facing some kind of underlying race condition where the devices would get assigned/locked during the device creation process. I have replaced the FC8 system drive and all is well. Baden Württemberg Ticket usage Can clients learn their time zone on a network configured using RA? this contact form

Browse other questions tagged linux centos mdadm or ask your own question. I just upgraded to Centos5 and now my hard drives are acting all weird.My partitions exsist, but can't be accessed by the mdadm tool. Not good This is how my mdstat currently look like: Code: $ cat /proc/mdstat Personalities : [raid0] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4] md2 : inactive md1[1](S) md0[7](S) sdg[6](S) sdh[4](S) sdf[3](S) 9767587464 blocks super First thing first, my raid setup: I have a Raid 5 with 6x2TB setup. 2 of those 2TB are actually Raid 0 of 2x1TB Here is the general setup: /dev/md0 -

Mdadm Cannot Open /dev/sda Device Or Resource Busy

Not the answer you're looking for? failures on the drives it said was failing. Sorry for my ignorance here. you need to build a new initrd without dmraid-driver, go to /boot, run the mkinitrdif you are using Centos 5.2 the mkinitrd command should not be use --omit-dmraid , charge it

This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. asked 4 years ago viewed 18712 times active 3 years ago Related 1Testing my raid array / is my mdadm raid working OK?14How do I rename an mdadm raid array?2Raid Issues Pen Tester's Programming Style Best way to remove old paint from door hinges Do Morpheus and his crew kill potential Ones? Mdadm Cannot Open /dev/sda1 No Such File Or Directory I did remove sda1 from the array, then delete and recreate the partition on sda, and attempt to add it back into the array, but continue to receive the same error

This space is where I want to set up a single, large RAID1 partition for Linux. (This, to my understanding, would be software RAID, whereas the Windows partitions are on hardware Also check out http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mdadm the "Known Issues" section has a solution if the dmraid driver has taken control. (You get the same device busy error) share|improve this answer answered Mar 9 mdadm: cannot open device /dev/sdc: Device or resource busy mdadm: /dev/sdc has wrong uuid. If you need to reset your password, click here.

What is with the speech audience? Mkfs.xfs Cannot Open /dev/sdb1 Device Or Resource Busy I've got a machine running FC8 ]# uname -a Linux 2.6.26.6-49.fc8 #1 SMP Fri Oct 17 15:33:32 EDT 2008 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux with an external eSATA Hard Drive RAID My cat sat down on my laptop, now the right side of my keyboard types the wrong characters more hot questions question feed about us tour help blog chat data legal mdadm: no uptodate device for slot 0 of /dev/md2 mdadm: no uptodate device for slot 2 of /dev/md2 mdadm: added /dev/sdf to /dev/md2 as 3 mdadm: added /dev/sdh to /dev/md2 as

Mdadm Device Is Busy Skipping

Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-server-73/mdadm-raid-inactive-assemble-fails-with-device-or-resource-busy-4175422782/ Visit the following links: Site Howto | Site FAQ | Sitemap | Register Now If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Mdadm Cannot Open /dev/sda Device Or Resource Busy How to react? Mdadm Add Device Or Resource Busy How do /dev/mapper and dmraid relate to all this mdadm stuff anyway?

I tried removing dmraid packages (and running update-initramfs though I'm not sure if that was relevant). weblink mdadm: cannot open device /dev/sdi1: Device or resource busy mdadm: /dev/sdi1 has wrong uuid. Seems it's "detecting" md0 as slot -1. Using fdisk both sda and sdb still look correct though. Mdadm Create Cannot Open Device Or Resource Busy

Got all my data back and everything (had to run testdisk to recover the partition but other than that, all the data is there). current status: ]# cat /proc/mdstat Personalities : [raid10] md3 : active raid10 sdh3[7] sdg3[6] sdf3[5] sde3[4] sdd3[3] sdc3[2] sdb3[1] sda3[0] 16766976 blocks super 1.2 512K chunks 2 near-copies [8/8] [UUUUUUUU] resync=DELAYED Ubuntu Logo, Ubuntu and Canonical Canonical Ltd. navigate here Reply Admin Log in Entries RSS Comments RSS WordPress.org Copyright © 2016 · Everybodyhertz.co.uk - Sam Marsh · www.everybodyhertz.co.uk current community blog chat Super User Meta Super User your communities Sign

sKaar View Public Profile View LQ Blog View Review Entries View HCL Entries Visit sKaar's homepage! Mdadm Destroy Array differently? This is my pillow mona is not in the sudoers file.

mdadm: /dev/sde has wrong uuid.

Do not forget to adjust the bootloader accordingly. How should horizontal dashboard numbers react on a responsive page? set wrong drive to faulty by accident1Rebuild Linux raid1 after os reinstall1DegradedArray event after rsync but later mdadm and smartctl do not show any issue0mdadm: All RAID disks look good, but Mdadm Zero Superblock httpd is stopped innd is stopped irattach is stopped irqbalance (pid 2085) is running...

vBulletin 2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. If any one of the 12 goes, you lose the whole array, so you greatly increase your chances of data loss over just using a single disk. Lesson learned lsblk is a nice tool. –Debrian Apr 7 '13 at 8:45 add a comment| Your Answer draft saved draft discarded Sign up or log in Sign up using http://ecoflashapps.com/cannot-open/cannot-open-dev-ttyusb0-device-or-resource-busy-ubuntu.html The issue manifested itself as a random failure during device creation: $ mdadm --create /dev/md0 --level=0 --chunk 256 --raid-devices=4 /dev/xvdh1 /dev/xvdh2 /dev/xvdh3 /dev/xvdh4 mdadm: Defaulting to version 1.2

Was a massive case of voter fraud uncovered in Florida? mdadm: /dev/md0 has wrong uuid. Best regards, Johannes Adv Reply Quick Navigation General Help Top Site Areas Settings Private Messages Subscriptions Who's Online Search Forums Forums Home Forums The Ubuntu Forum Community Ubuntu Official Flavours What now?

asked 3 years ago viewed 18316 times active 1 year ago Visit Chat Related 8Linux Software Raid 10 hung after 1 drive failed, mdadm will not let me force remove the Error-messages like this will occur:mdadm: Cannot open /dev/sdb1: Device or resource busyTo solve this problem, you need to build a new initrd without the dmraid-driver. blackman890 View Public Profile View LQ Blog View Review Entries View HCL Entries Find More Posts by blackman890 08-18-2012, 11:47 PM #4 sKaar Member Registered: Jun 2006 Location: dartmouth, mdadm: /dev/md0 is identified as a member of /dev/md2, slot -1.

I just created the partition. –JGazlyVFX Mar 9 '12 at 0:01 1 You should not be creating a 12 disk raid0. wait, what? Select 2D data in a certain range How Did The Dred Scott Decision Contribute to the Civil War? more stack exchange communities company blog Stack Exchange Inbox Reputation and Badges sign up log in tour help Tour Start here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed

more hot questions question feed about us tour help blog chat data legal privacy policy work here advertising info mobile contact us feedback Technology Life / Arts Culture / Recreation Science Why do languages require parenthesis around expressions when used with "if" and "while"? Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.

Besides that, there are two traditional 500 GB hard drives, which have Windows 7 installed (I want to keep the Windows installation intact), and about half of the space unallocated. multipathd is stopped netconsole module not loaded netplugd is stopped Configured devices: lo eth0 eth1 Currently active devices: lo eth0 eth1 virbr0 NetworkManager (pid 2402) is running... What does an expansion in early december mean for the standard format?